Observational study assesses SARS-CoV-2 immunity in children with inborn errors of immunity, indicating sustained immune benefits post-vaccination.
To assess the durability of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity following three doses of COVID-19 vaccine in children with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). In this multi-center observational study, we compared SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and T-cell immunity 24 weeks after the third dose of monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children (5–18 years) with IEI and healthy controls (HC). Participants with IEI were categorized into predominant antibody deficiency (PAD) or non-PAD subgroups. Forty-three children with IEI (26 with PAD and 17 with non-PAD; 16 females, mean age 10.5 ± 4 years) and 12 HC (7 females, mean age 14.1 ± 3 years) were included. Anti-RBD IgG and anti-S IgG seropositivity was 100% in both groups. However, geometric mean concentrations (95% confidence interval) were significantly lower in IEI versus HC: 1,349.0 (905.4–2,009.9) vs. 3,324.2 (1,762.8–6,268.6) BAU/mL, p = 0.03 for anti-RBD IgG, and 1,336.4 (938.2 – 1,903.5) vs. 3,320.9 (2,158.4 – 5109.7), BAU/mL, p = 0.012 for anti-S IgG. Neutralizing antibody titers against ancestral and Omicron BA.1, BA.4/BA.5, and XBB.1.5 were also significantly lower in IEI, especially among PAD participants (p = 0.001). In contrast, S-specific T-cell responses did not differ significantly between IEI and HC. Six months after the third COVID-19 vaccine dose, children with IEI retained SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity, though antibody responses were attenuated, particularly among PAD cases. Importantly, spike-specific T-cell responses were preserved and comparable to HC. These findings underscore that, in real-world settings, children with IEI maintain durable SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity—including memory T-cell responses—highlighting the benefit of vaccination and the potential for continued immune protection despite impaired humoral responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: