Evaluates air temperature trends, identifying a shift to warmer conditions by 2000.
This study addresses the scarcity of long-term climatic data in the Cananéia–Iguape Coastal System (CICS) by identifying a validated reanalysis-based framework for coastal climate monitoring. We evaluate which ECMWF product (ERA5, ERA5-Land, and AgERA5) best represents regional conditions against station observations (2007–2022). Our findings establish AgERA5 as the superior product for this coastal interface, overcoming the land–sea mask limitations of ERA5-Land. Using this validated series (1981–2022), we identify a pivotal climatic breakpoint in the year 2000, marking a transition to a significantly warmer regime. Annual trends show a persistent increase of 0.022 °C year⁻¹ (ranging from 0.02 °C year⁻¹ to 0.03 °C year⁻¹), with a pronounced seasonal asymmetry where September records the largest warming (0.05 °C year⁻¹). By providing a justified reanalysis choice and identifying a coherent regime shift, this study establishes a validated climatic baseline that can support future studies on potential ecosystem responses. • Four-station validation of ERA5, ERA5-Land, and AgERA5 air temperature over CICS. • AgERA5 outperforms ERA5 and ERA5-Land in reproducing monthly and seasonal air temperature across CICS. • A robust breakpoint around 2000 marks a shift toward warmer conditions across CICS. • Warming is seasonally asymmetric in CICS, peaking in JFM, JAS, OND, and in September–October.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baratto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: