This article examines how Global South journals seek recognition while addressing local audience needs, highlighting inequalities in knowledge production.
This article examines the editorial policies and structural characteristics of Global South-based communication, media, and journalism academic journals, analyzing how they balance the tension between seeking international recognition and addressing the needs of local audiences. Using two datasets—one detailing journal attributes and another mapping editorial board members—we investigated the websites of 71 SCImago Journal & Country Rank-indexed journals published across 27 non-Western countries. Findings reveal a prevailing adherence to Global North academic standards, which might constrain de-Westernization efforts and South-South collaboration. The strategies and challenges these outlets face underscore persistent inequalities in global knowledge production and visibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marques et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: