Randomized trial suggests practical guidelines for implementing latent profile analysis in illness perception research, indicating careful consideration of sample size is crucial.
Latent profile analysis (LPA) is an emerging approach to analyze the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). LPA creates subgroups with similar illness perceptions. We used simulated data sets to provide suggestions and considerations for IPQ-R researchers implementing LPA. We explored 640 simulation parameters, varying sample size, IPQ-R distribution, covariance, and subscale means, simulating 3 distinct latent subgroups. We simulated 1000 samples for each setting via MClust package in R. Caution should be used when N < 100, as LPA only performs adequately (<50% detection). N ⩾ 100 still may not yield ideal performance depending on sample (e.g., subgroup sizes, within-group variance). With more differences between subgroups, LPA is more accurate. However, researchers have little control over mean differences, except indirectly (e.g., diverse sample). Researchers using LPA with IPQ-R data must carefully consider anticipated sample heterogeneity to establish appropriate sample size estimates. Resources provided in this manuscript can support these determinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: