This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Yaniv Riz’s Unified Informational Theory: Time, Force, Gauge Structure, Matter, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Riz’s central claim that physical reality is not grounded primarily in spacetime, autonomous fields, or elementary particles, but in informational distinguishability organized through potential information, distinct or structural information, and dispersed or entropic information. The analysis explores possible compatibilities between UIT and TO, especially regarding the principles of distinction, boundary, observation, composition, transcendence, emergent time, informational gravitation, phase dynamics, memory, cosmological opening, and empirical testability. Particular attention is given to the TO interpretation that the transcendent element corresponds to the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and is equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies important modal tensions. While UIT tends to treat information as an ontological primitive, the Theory of Objectivity grounds cosmic genesis in the anteriority of Nothingness as a Primitive and Eternal Mathematical Essence. Therefore, the article proposes that UIT may be understood not as an ultimate foundation, but as an intermediate physical theory capable of formalizing phenomenic aspects of informational transcendence, radiation, memory, phase, gravitation, and operational testability within the broader modal discipline of TO. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Unified Informational Theory; Yaniv Riz; informational distinguishability; emergent time; atomic radiation; informational transcendence; modal ontology; Inductive Effects; cosmology; gravitation; phase dynamics; quantum information; memory; empirical testability.
Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.