Key result
Impaired lung function is linked to higher incident HF risk, particularly HFpEF, rivaling major risk factors.
Why the study?
Associations of lung function impairment with risk of incident heart failure were not well established.
Does lung function impairment increase the risk of incident heart failure in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=31,677)
Yes
Does lung function impairment increase the risk of incident heart failure in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
Hazard Ratio: 1.17 (95% CI 1.07–1.27)
Lung function impairment, both obstructive and restrictive, is independently associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure, particularly HFpEF.
May warrant attention in HF risk assessment but should not yet change practice; leaves open causality and therapeutic implications for HFpEF.
AIMS: The aim is to evaluate associations of lung function impairment with risk of incident heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were pooled across eight US population-based cohorts that enrolled participants from 1987 to 2004. Participants with self-reported baseline cardiovascular disease were excluded. Spirometry was used to define obstructive [forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <0.70] or restrictive (FEV1/FVC ≥0.70, FVC <80%) lung physiology. The incident HF was defined as hospitalization or death caused by HF. In a sub-set, HF events were sub-classified as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF <50%) or preserved EF (HFpEF; EF ≥50%). The Fine-Gray proportional sub-distribution hazards models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, smoking, and cardiovascular risk factors. In models of incident HF sub-types, HFrEF, HFpEF, and non-HF mortality were treated as competing risks. Among 31 677 adults, there were 3344 incident HF events over a median follow-up of 21.0 years. Of 2066 classifiable HF events, 1030 were classified as HFrEF and 1036 as HFpEF. Obstructive [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.27] and restrictive physiology (adjusted HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.27-1.62) were associated with incident HF. Obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defects were associated with HFpEF but not HFrEF. The magnitude of the association between restrictive physiology and HFpEF was similar to associations with hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. CONCLUSION: Lung function impairment was associated with increased risk of incident HF, and particularly incident HFpEF, independent of and to a similar extent as major known cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckhardt et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Incident heart failure (n=31,677). Lung function impairment (obstructive or restrictive physiology) vs. Normal lung function was evaluated on Incident heart failure (hospitalization or death caused by HF) (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.27). Obstructive and restrictive lung physiology were associated with increased risk of incident heart failure (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.27 and HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.27-1.62, respectively), particularly HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: