Key result
Oxygen-pulse plateau during CPET uniquely detects ischemia severity and predicts PCI efficacy in single-vessel CAD.
Why the study?
Does the presence of an oxygen-pulse plateau during cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI in patients with single-vessel CAD?
RCT (n=195)
Blinded
1:1
Does the presence of an oxygen-pulse plateau during cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI in patients with single-vessel CAD?
In patients with single-vessel CAD, an oxygen-pulse plateau during cardiopulmonary exercise testing detects myocardial ischemia severity and predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI on ischemia and angina symptoms.
May identify single-vessel CAD patients likely to benefit from PCI; extends CPET beyond symptom correlation to predict placebo-controlled efficacy.
AIMS: Oxygen-pulse morphology and gas exchange analysis measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been associated with myocardial ischaemia. The aim of this analysis was to examine the relationship between CPET parameters, myocardial ischaemia and anginal symptoms in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and to determine the ability of these parameters to predict the placebo-controlled response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with severe single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) were randomized 1:1 to PCI or placebo in the ORBITA trial. Subjects underwent pre-randomization treadmill CPET, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and symptom assessment. These assessments were repeated at the end of a 6-week blinded follow-up period.A total of 195 patients with CPET data were randomized (102 PCI, 93 placebo). Patients in whom an oxygen-pulse plateau was observed during CPET had higher (more ischaemic) DSE score [+0.82 segments; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40 to 1.25, P = 0.0068] and lower fractional flow reserve (-0.07; 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.02, P = 0.011) compared with those without. At lower (more abnormal) oxygen-pulse slopes, there was a larger improvement of the placebo-controlled effect of PCI on DSE score [oxygen-pulse plateau presence (Pinteraction = 0.026) and oxygen-pulse gradient (Pinteraction = 0.023)] and Seattle angina physical-limitation score [oxygen-pulse plateau presence (Pinteraction = 0.037)]. Impaired peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, peak oxygen-pulse, and oxygen uptake efficacy slope was significantly associated with higher symptom burden but did not relate to severity of ischaemia or predict response to PCI. CONCLUSION: Although selected CPET parameters relate to severity of angina symptoms and quality of life, only an oxygen-pulse plateau detects the severity of myocardial ischaemia and predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI in patients with single-vessel CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganesananthan et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Severe single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=195). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) score in patients with vs without an oxygen-pulse plateau (MD +0.82 segments, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.25, p=0.0068). An oxygen-pulse plateau during CPET was associated with a more ischaemic DSE score (+0.82 segments; 95% CI 0.40-1.25; P=0.0068) and predicted the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: