Why the study?
Does NT-proBNP measurement improve the detection and evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction compared to BNP in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does NT-proBNP measurement improve the detection and evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction compared to BNP in patients with chronic heart failure?
NT-proBNP may be a more discerning marker than BNP for detecting and evaluating heart failure, particularly for identifying patients with LVEF <50%.
NT-proBNP may offer modestly better LVEF<50% discrimination than BNP; leaves open whether it should supplant BNP in HF evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has become a potent diagnostic aid as a means of identifying patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Due to better stability in circulating blood, we reasoned that measurement of N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) may be a more discerning marker for the detection and evaluation of chronic heart failure. METHODS: The relationships between plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP and BNP, and aetiology, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were analyzed in 105 patients with chronic heart failure. Sixty-seven healthy volunteers were studied as the controls. RESULTS: Both NT-proBNP and BNP showed progressive increases (P<0.001) in proportion to the NYHA classification; the increment of NT-proBNP was larger than that of BNP. Elevated NT-proBNP significantly correlated with BNP (r=0.737, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis to detect LVEF<40% showed similar values (area under the curve, AUC: NT-proBNP 0.754 vs. BNP 0.770), however, AUC to detect LVEF<50% tended to be greater for NT-proBNP than that for BNP (NT-proBNP 0.820 vs. BNP 0.794). CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP may be a more discerning marker for the detection and evaluation of heart failure than BNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seino et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: