Why the study?
Traditional prognostic models for STEMI have limitations in statistical methods and usability.
Does a machine-learning based risk score accurately predict in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and LVEF <40% in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Does a machine-learning based risk score accurately predict in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and LVEF <40% in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
A machine-learning based risk score (STEMI-ML) using 5 clinical variables effectively predicts in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and reduced LVEF in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification in STEMI-PCI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Traditional prognostic models for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have limitations in statistical methods and usability. Objective: We aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (LVEF < 40%) in STEMI patients. Methods: We reviewed 1,863 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or rescue PCI. Eight supervised ML methods [LASSO, ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting] were trained and validated. A feature selection method was used to establish more informative and nonredundant variables, which were then considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/25/30(all). Final models were chosen to optimise area under the curve (AUC) score while ensuring interpretability. Results: Overall, 128 (6.9%) patients died in hospital, with 292 (15.7%) patients requiring ICU admission and 373 (20.0%) patients with LVEF < 40%. The best-performing model with 5 included variables, EN, achieved an AUC of 0.79 for in-hospital mortality, 0.78 for ICU admission, and 0.74 for LVEF < 40%. The included variables were age, pre-hospital cardiac arrest, robust collateral recruitment (Rentrop grade 2 or 3), family history of coronary disease, initial systolic blood pressure, initial heart rate, hypercholesterolemia, culprit vessel, smoking status and TIMI flow pre-PCI. We developed a user-friendly web application for real-world use, yielding risk scores as a percentage. Conclusions: The STEMI-ML score effectively predicts in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients and may assist with risk stratification and individualising patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sritharan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: