Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 25, 1998New England Journal of Medicine

Rating the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography — Do Practicing Physicians Agree with an Expert Panel and with Each Other?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JAJohn Z. AyanianBoston UniversityMLMary Beth LandrumHarvard UniversitySharon‐Lise T. NormandSharon‐Lise T. NormandGeneral Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ayanian et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14bdbc0d8017361865af4https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199806253382608
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness1987 · 124 citations
  2. 2Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty after Acute Myocardial Infarction1997 · 32 citations
  3. 3Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State1994 · 25 citations
  4. 4Internists' Attitudes about Clinical Practice Guidelines1994 · 444 citations