Why the study?
Little was known regarding intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria to determine the functional severity of coronary stenosis.
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurement of minimal luminal area and area stenosis accurately predict the physiological severity of coronary stenosis (FFR <0.75) in patients with coronary stenosis?
Observational (n=42)
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurement of minimal luminal area and area stenosis accurately predict the physiological severity of coronary stenosis (FFR <0.75) in patients with coronary stenosis?
Anatomic parameters measured by IVUS (specifically minimal luminal area <3.0 mm² and area stenosis >0.6) correlate significantly with fractional flow reserve and can serve as anatomic predictors for the physiological severity of coronary epicardial stenosis.
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria to determine the functional severity of coronary stenosis. Recently, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a lesion-specific index of the functional severity of a coronary stenosis that is independent of systemic hemodynamic variability. The present study was undertaken to determine the IVUS parameters for the physiological severity of coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one lesions in 42 patients were evaluated by means of quantitative coronary angiogram, IVUS, and intracoronary pressure measurements. The FFR was calculated as the ratio of the distal coronary pressure divided by the proximal coronary pressure under hyperemia. We considered a value of the FFR <0.75 as significant in determining inducible ischemia, according to the previous studies. The minimal luminal area (MLA) and the area stenosis were measured by IVUS. By regression analysis, the MLA showed a positive correlation with the FFR value (r(2)=0.62, P<0.0001). The area stenosis had a significant inverse correlation with the value of FFR (r(2)=0.60, P<0.0001). The IVUS thresholds that maximized the sensitivity and specificity were MLA <3.0 mm(2) (sensitivity, 83.0%; specificity, 92.3%) and area stenosis >0.6 (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 88.5%). The combination of both criteria (MLA <3.0 mm(2) and area stenosis <0.6) without exception met a value of the FFR <0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic parameters obtained by IVUS showed a significant correlation to the FFR values. The present study demonstrated that the combination of the MLA and area stenosis measured by IVUS can be an anatomic predictor for the physiological impact of coronary epicardial stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takagi et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Coronary stenosis (n=42). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment (minimal luminal area and area stenosis) vs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR <0.75) was evaluated on Correlation and diagnostic accuracy of IVUS parameters (minimal luminal area and area stenosis) for functionally significant stenosis (FFR <0.75) (r2=0.62 (MLA); r2=0.60 (area stenosis), p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: