Why the study?
To evaluate the long-term clinical results following PCI with ultrathin strut (60 μm) bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in real-world clinical practice in a US postmarket study.
In a real-world US registry, ultrathin strut bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy at 2 years with low rates of target lesion failure and stent thrombosis.
Supports real-world use of ultrathin BP-SES; leaves open comparative efficacy versus contemporary DES in RCTs.
Background: Contemporary large-scale trials have demonstrated enhanced safety and efficacy for ultrathin strut coronary drug-eluting stents. A postmarket US study evaluating ultrathin strut drug-eluting stents committed to long-term follow-up was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical results following percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin strut (60 μm) bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP SES) in real-world clinical practice. Methods: BIOFLOW VII is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm registry examining the clinical effectiveness of an ultrathin strut (60 μm) BP SES with dedicated follow-up through 5 years. The primary end point of 12-month target lesion failure (TLF) was previously reported. A prespecified analysis of 2-year clinical outcomes was performed. Results: BIOFLOW VII enrolled 556 patients at 31 sites in the United States. The average stent length (mean ± SD) was 20.2 ± 11.8 mm, and the mean number of stents per patient was 1.3 ± 0.6. The 2-year TLF rate was 5.2% (27/522). TLF component rates included cardiac death, 1.7% (9/522); target vessel-related myocardial infarction, 1.7% (9/515); and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, 2.7% (14/515). Definite stent thrombosis was observed in 3 cases (0.5%): 1 acute (≤24 hours), 1 late (>30 days and ≤1 year), and 1 very late (>1 year) event. Conclusions: The 2-year BIOFLOW VII results demonstrate the durability of efficacy and safety of ultrathin BP SES. Favorably low rates of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization and definite late/very late stent thrombosis were concordant with prior trials with ultrathin BP SES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandzari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: