The future of work is being fundamentally reshaped with evidence indicating that AI is eliminating entry-level roles for graduates worldwide faster than organisations, organisational workforce development, and national human resource development (HRD) systems can respond, creating what is now termed the “Jobpocalypse phenomenon.” This phenomenon has major implications for HRD and its body of theory, research, and both country- and organisational-level practices. In this commentary, we consider and examine the scope and implications of the Jobpocalypse phenomenon, and argue that firm-level AI adoption decisions have the potential to produce system-level consequences. We challenge the foundational assumption within HRD that early-career pathways for developing technical and managerial talent will naturally replenish themselves. To address the complexities of the Jobpocalypse Phenomenon, we take a novel approach focused on our dual positionality as “junior” and “senior” scholars and co-authors, providing a distinctive analytic vantage point. In our analysis of the Jobpocalypse phenomenon, we identify three nested paradoxes embedded within this phenomenon: (i) the development versus efficiency paradox, (ii) the individual-talent versus systemic-pathways paradox, and (iii) the AI tool versus AI architect paradox. We propose three interconnected theoretical reconceptualisations that update HRD’s analytical focus and derive a research agenda with guiding questions that direct scholarly and practitioner attention to this contemporary phenomenon. We additionally outline what country-level and organisational HRD systems can do to address this phenomenon.
Abid et al. (Mon,) studied this question.