Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals pressure injuries link to low GCS and comorbidities in ICU patients, suggesting nutritional risk assessment importance.
Objective: This study evaluated the relationships between the development and clinical course of pressure injuries (PIs) and neurological status, nutritional risk, and laboratory parameters among patients admitted to a tertiary intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: The single-center, retrospective, observational study included 220 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 5 days. On the day of admission, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Braden, and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) scores were assessed. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, need for sedation and vasopressors, and laboratory parameters during the first 24 h (albumin, C-reactive protein, lactate, D-dimer) were analyzed. Factors independently associated with new PI development and clinical improvement were identified using binary logistic regression. Results: New PIs developed in 25% of patients. Patients with PI progression were older and had lower GCS and Braden scores, higher NRS-2002 scores, lower albumin levels, and higher D-dimer levels (p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, low GCS (OR = 0.824), presence of comorbidity (OR = 2.327), and a high NRS-2002 risk level were independent predictors of new PI development. The model’s discriminative ability was acceptable (AUC = 0.756). Among patients with existing PIs, NRS-2002 score (OR = 0.450) and age (OR = 1.058) were independently associated with clinical improvement in an exploratory multivariable model. Conclusions: NRS-2002 was the only variable independently associated with both new PI development and the clinical improvement of existing lesions, underscoring the central role of nutritional risk assessment in ICU-based PI prevention and prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elif Kerimoğlu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: