Analysis of dysphonia shows potential to improve clinical assessment of voice disorders, indicating reliable metrics like cepstral peak prominence.
The Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) program provides advanced acoustic measures that have improved the objectivity and reliability of clinical voice assessment. Among its parameters, cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and low/high spectral ratio (SR) have demonstrated significant diagnostic value in differentiating normal and pathological voices. CPP quantifies the degree of harmonic organization within a voice signal, reflecting periodicity and vocal stability, while the SR captures the spectral energy balance between low- and high-frequency bands, offering supplementary information on breathiness and noise components. Compared with conventional perturbation-based methods such as the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, ADSV parameters are less affected by signal irregularity and maintain analytical robustness even in severely dysphonic voices. Recent studies have established normative CPP and SR values for both Korean and international populations, providing practical reference ranges for clinical application. Furthermore, ADSV-derived indices such as the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia, Acoustic Psychometric Severity Index of Dysphonia, and Comprehensive Index of Vocal Fatigue have shown promise for quantifying overall dysphonia severity and vocal fatigue. Despite some limitations—such as the need for standardized recording conditions—ADSV measures represent a major advancement toward evidence-based, quantitative voice diagnostics and hold significant potential for integration into clinical and telepractice settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: