This study reexamines the fundamental limitations inherent in the core assumptions of Big Bang cosmology, particularly the concepts of the singularity and the interpretation of the Hubble constant. The singularity, which presupposes infinite density, represents a mathematically divergent and physically non-realizable state. Likewise, the Hubble constant reveals inconsistencies through the so-called Hubble tension, wherein its value varies depending on observational methods, thereby exposing the incompleteness of the conventional interpretation. In response, this study proposes the framework of Electromagnetic Rotational Resonance Cosmology, in which the universe is redefined as a resonance-driven contractive pressure environment based on absolute temperature (0 K). Within this framework, the origin of the universe is interpreted not as an explosive event, but as a rotational phase transition of a resonant structure. Accordingly, the singularity is understood not as an infinite state, but as a critical boundary of state transition. Furthermore, the cosmic microwave background is reinterpreted not as relic radiation from the past, but as a fundamental resonant oscillatory state continuously generated by the resonance field (analogous to waves on the surface of a sea). In addition, redshift is interpreted not as direct evidence of cosmic expansion, but as an optical phenomenon arising within the resonant environment. The Hubble constant is redefined not as a universal expansion rate, but as a state-dependent variable governed by the level of electron activity within the electromagnetic resonance field. This perspective provides a new interpretative framework in which the Hubble tension can be understood as a natural consequence. Consequently, this study redefines the universe not as a static expanding structure originating from a singular explosive event, but as a dynamic system continuously generated, transformed, and cycled through resonance and rotation, and proposes a fundamental reconstruction of the interpretative framework of modern cosmology. *Note: This paper is part of a series of studies. For a more comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to refer to the materials listed below.
DEOKHO JEON (Tue,) studied this question.