Automated detection improves precision in identifying lunar features, indicating challenges with class imbalance.
On the lunar surface, wrinkle ridges, grabens, and lobate scarps represent key tectonic landforms that reflect the evolution of the Moon’s stress field and its tectonic processes. However, these linear structures often exhibit weak textures, low contrast, and large scale variations, making manual interpretation inefficient and subjective. To address this issue, this study introduces an improved YOLOv8 model, termed HL-YOLOv8, for the automated detection of lunar linear features. The model incorporates a multiscale lightweight channel attention (C2f_MLCA) module into the backbone network to enhance the extraction of fine-grained and weak-texture features and integrates a multihead self-attention (C2f_MHSA) module in the feature fusion stage to improve the modelling of long-range spatial dependencies. In addition, the combination of a dual focal loss and a diversified data augmentation strategy effectively mitigates the detection difficulties caused by class imbalance and weak-feature samples. The experimental results obtained using the global LROC-WAC image dataset demonstrate that HL-YOLOv8 significantly outperforms the baseline YOLOv8 and other comparative models in terms of precision, recall, and mAP@0.5. Specifically, the proposed model achieved an average precision of 73.5%, an average recall of 73.1%, and an average mAP@0.5 of 74.6% on the evaluation dataset, showing particularly strong performance in detecting elongated grabens and boundary-blurred lobate scarps. The global distribution maps derived from the model predictions indicate that HL-YOLOv8 can be applied to comprehensively reconstruct the spatial patterns of the three types of linear structures and identify potential new features in high-latitude and geologically complex regions, demonstrating excellent generalizability and robustness. This study provides an efficient and reliable framework for the automated identification and global mapping of lunar linear features and offers a transferable methodological reference for the tectonic interpretation of terrestrial planets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: