PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026European Journal Of Dental Education0 citationsOpen Access

Educational Strategies in Children's Oral Health: A Critical Integrative Review on Pedagogical Foundations

View Full Paper
VMVictória Saraiva MartinsUniversidade de BrasíliaJCJakeline Barbosa CaldasUniversidade de BrasíliaTSTiago Araújo Coelho de SouzaUniversidade de Brasília

Key Points

  • This paper critically analyzes the educational strategies used to promote oral health in children.
  • Reviewed literature from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and ERIC databases, along with grey literature.
  • Two researchers independently screened materials for eligibility and extracted data using a standardized form.
  • Categorized studies into five pedagogical approaches based on intervention objectives.
  • Included 76 articles in the review.
  • Found that Technicism was predominant in 38 studies, followed by Constructivism in 18, Historical-Cultural in 9, Pragmatism in 8, and Contemporary in 3.
  • Most children's oral health interventions lack a strong theoretical and pedagogical foundation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to critically analyse whether the pedagogical methods employed in promoting children's oral health are anchored in theoretical and methodological frameworks in education, and to what extent this anchoring manifests itself. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS and ERIC databases, including grey literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles for eligibility and extracted relevant data using a standardized form. Qualitative analysis categorized the studies into five pedagogical approaches (Technicism, Pragmatism, Constructivism, Historical-Cultural and Contemporary), based on the objectives and conduct of the interventions. RESULTS: We included 76 articles in the review. The qualitative analysis indicated that the Technicist Perspective predominated in 38 studies, followed by Constructivism (18), Historical-Cultural (9), Pragmatism (8) and Contemporary (3). CONCLUSION: Most interventions in children's Oral Health Education lack a theoretical and pedagogical foundation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martins et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f1547f879cb923c49449eehttps://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A systematic review of oral health educational media innovation for visually impaired children: Which one brings the best impact of change?2021 · 9 citations
  2. 2Oral Hygiene Indirect Instruction and Periodic Reinforcements: Effects on Index Plaque in Schoolchildren2009 · 38 citations
  3. 3The gamification and development of a chatbot to promote oral self-care by adopting behavior change wheel for Taiwanese children2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Improving dental‐oral health learning in students using a mobile application (“My tooth“): A controlled before and after study2021 · 11 citations
  5. 5Natural peer group approach as a learning strategist for maximizing dental health education in school-age children2020 · 4 citations