Analysis reveals 74.2% of COVID-19 websites have critical accessibility failures, highlighting the need for improved frameworks.
Government COVID-19 websites became the primary channel for public health communication, yet their accessibility for disabled users remained largely unexamined. This study evaluates 62 official COVID-19 websites across 34 countries using the Crisis Web Accessibility Score (CWAS), a composite metric based on WCAG 2.1 Level AA criteria. Results show that 74.2% of sites contain critical accessibility failures, with an average CWAS of 43.1/100. While visual barriers were most frequent, cognitive accessibility issues had the highest public-safety impact. Websites with prior accessibility programs performed significantly better. Based on these findings, we propose the Crisis Accessible Web Protocol (CAWP), a 72-hour deployable framework for accessible emergency web communication, along with policy recommendations to improve accessibility in future crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: