Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical study reveals changes in healthcare dynamics for primary care doctors, suggesting systemic reform challenges.
The article analyzes the changes taking place in the professional autonomy of general practitioners (GPs) in the context of health care reform since the late 1990s. Using the concept of professional jurisdiction of Andrew Abbott and data from an empirical study conducted among GPs in Tryavna and their patients, the analysis shows the change in the three levels of professional autonomy (diagnosis – treatment – follow-up) with bureaucratic principles. The observed changes transformed medical care into services and patient attitudes into client. The article problematizes relationships between the state (reform), the primary care doctors (GPs) and their patients through the prism of professional autonomy and focuses on the question of whether the criticized health reform has not become a convenient routine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slavova et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: