Retrospective analysis showed antibiotic use reduces immunotherapy efficacy and immune-related adverse events in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, suggesting impaired immune activation.
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). As antibiotics (Abx) may reduce ICI efficacy, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) relate to better outcomes, we investigated their association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 121 advanced or metastatic ESCC patients treated with ICIs, assessing outcomes based on Abx use and irAEs. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (33.9%) were in the Abx (+) group, showing a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (2.5 vs. 6.5 months; p = 0.029) and lower disease control rate (36.8% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.0145) than those in the Abx (-) group. irAEs were less frequent in the Abx (+) group (29.3% vs. 58.8%; p = 0.0037). The positive impact of irAEs on ICI efficacy was significant in overall population [irAE(-) vs. irAE(+): PFS, 4.4 months (95% CI 2.5-5.3) vs. 8.8 months (95% CI 5.9-13.7); log-rank p = 0.001; Hazard ratio (HR) 1.76, 95% CI 1.14-2.74; p = 0.011; overall survival (OS), 10.6 months (95% CI 7.0-13.1) vs. 18.1 months (95% CI 9.2-25.9); log-rank p = 0.043; HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01-2.55; p = 0.046] but diminished if received Abx. Notably, the Abx (-)/irAE (+) group had the best outcomes, while the Abx (+)/irAE (-) group had the worst PFS (8.7 vs. 2.4 months; HR 2.07; p = 0.011) and OS (18.1 and 6.8 months; HR 1.89; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic use was linked to reduced ICI efficacy and fewer irAEs, suggesting impaired immune activation in ESCC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirakawa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: