Pilot trial shows adaptive web training boosts cognitive self-efficacy and technology adoption for memory aid in older adults, suggesting new intervention paths.
OBJECTIVE: This pilot study evaluated a web-based adaptive training platform for teaching older adults with cognitive concerns to use the Electronic Memory and Management Aid (EMMA), a digital cognitive support tool. Outcomes were compared between a self-guided, technical support-only condition and a clinician-supported (M + T) condition that included motivational enhancement. METHOD: = 62) were randomized to one of two conditions. Over 4 weeks, 49 participants successfully completed six adaptive, web-based lessons. The M + T group received weekly clinician-led motivational sessions; both groups had access to technical support. Primary outcomes assessed at baseline and 3 months posttraining included EMMA app usage, everyday function, and self-reported cognitive self-efficacy and health. Secondary outcomes included perceived cognition, coping self-efficacy, compensation use, and medication management. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable EMMA engagement and improvements in applied everyday cognition (η² = .14), with no significant group-by-time interaction. Medium effect sizes (η² = .06-.09) were observed for other outcomes but did not reach significance. App usage did not predict improvements in applied everyday cognition; however, participants with lower baseline self-efficacy and greater perceived cognitive difficulties used the app more frequently. Qualitative feedback highlighted EMMA's usability and benefits for daily organization, alongside barriers to sustained use. CONCLUSIONS: A self-guided, adaptive training platform with minimal clinician support may be sufficient to promote engagement with a digital memory aid. Findings support scalable digital interventions and underscore the role of perceived need in technology adoption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitter-Edgecombe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: