Key result
Intravenous adenosine shows no benefit over placebo for CHF or death at 6 months.
Why the study?
Previous small studies suggested adenosine may reduce evolving infarct size, but its effect on clinical outcomes and infarct size in STEMI patients undergoing reperfusion therapy remained to be determined.
RCT (n=2,118)
Double-blind
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 16.3% vs 17.9%
p-value: p=0.43
IV adenosine should not enter routine STEMI care; confirms no clinical benefit and strengthens evidence against use.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of intravenous adenosine on clinical outcomes and infarct size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing reperfusion therapy. BACKGROUND: Previous small studies suggest that adenosine may reduce the size of an evolving infarction. METHODS: Patients (n = 2,118) with evolving anterior STEMI receiving thrombolysis or primary angioplasty were randomized to a 3-h infusion of either adenosine 50 or 70 microg/kg/min or of placebo. The primary end point was new congestive heart failure (CHF) beginning >24 h after randomization, or the first re-hospitalization for CHF, or death from any cause within six months. Infarct size was measured in a subset of 243 patients by technetium-99m sestamibi tomography. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary end point between placebo (17.9%) and either the pooled adenosine dose groups (16.3%) or, separately, the 50-microg/kg/min dose and 70-microg/kg/min groups (16.5% vs. 16.1%, respectively, p = 0.43). The pooled adenosine group trended toward a smaller median infarct size compared with the placebo group, 17% versus 27% (p = 0.074). A dose-response relationship with final median infarct size was seen: 11% at the high dose (p = 0.023 vs. placebo) and 23% at the low dose (p = NS vs. placebo). Infarct size and occurrence of a primary end point were significantly related (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion therapy were not significantly improved with adenosine, although infarct size was reduced with the 70-microg/kg/min adenosine infusion, a finding that correlated with fewer adverse clinical events. A larger study limited to the 70-microg/kg/min dose is, therefore, warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=2,118). Adenosine vs. Placebo was evaluated on New congestive heart failure (CHF) beginning >24 h after randomization, or the first re-hospitalization for CHF, or death from any cause within six months (p=0.43). Intravenous adenosine did not significantly improve the composite of new CHF, re-hospitalization for CHF, or death at 6 months compared to placebo (16.3% vs 17.9%, p=0.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: