Intravenous adenosine did not significantly improve the composite of new CHF, re-hospitalization for CHF, or death at 6 months compared to placebo (16.3% vs 17.9%, p=0.43).
RCT (n=2,118)
Double-blind
Yes
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=2,118)
Adenosine vs Placebo (50 or 70 microg/kg/min)
New congestive heart failure (CHF) beginning >24 h after randomization, or the first re-hospitalization for CHF, or death from any cause within six months, p=0.43
Absolute Event Rate: 16.3% vs 17.9%
p-value: p=0.43
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of intravenous adenosine on clinical outcomes and infarct size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing reperfusion therapy. BACKGROUND: Previous small studies suggest that adenosine may reduce the size of an evolving infarction. METHODS: Patients (n = 2,118) with evolving anterior STEMI receiving thrombolysis or primary angioplasty were randomized to a 3-h infusion of either adenosine 50 or 70 microg/kg/min or of placebo. The primary end point was new congestive heart failure (CHF) beginning >24 h after randomization, or the first re-hospitalization for CHF, or death from any cause within six months. Infarct size was measured in a subset of 243 patients by technetium-99m sestamibi tomography. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary end point between placebo (17.9%) and either the pooled adenosine dose groups (16.3%) or, separately, the 50-microg/kg/min dose and 70-microg/kg/min groups (16.5% vs. 16.1%, respectively, p = 0.43). The pooled adenosine group trended toward a smaller median infarct size compared with the placebo group, 17% versus 27% (p = 0.074). A dose-response relationship with final median infarct size was seen: 11% at the high dose (p = 0.023 vs. placebo) and 23% at the low dose (p = NS vs. placebo). Infarct size and occurrence of a primary end point were significantly related (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion therapy were not significantly improved with adenosine, although infarct size was reduced with the 70-microg/kg/min adenosine infusion, a finding that correlated with fewer adverse clinical events. A larger study limited to the 70-microg/kg/min dose is, therefore, warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allan M. Ross
American College of Cardiology
Raymond J. Gibbons
General Cardiology
Gregg W. Stone
Interventional Cardiology
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
University of Southern California
Emory University
Mayo Clinic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ross et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=2,118). Adenosine vs. Placebo was evaluated on New congestive heart failure (CHF) beginning >24 h after randomization, or the first re-hospitalization for CHF, or death from any cause within six months (p=0.43). Intravenous adenosine did not significantly improve the composite of new CHF, re-hospitalization for CHF, or death at 6 months compared to placebo (16.3% vs 17.9%, p=0.43).
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f178a3adb7394e289b48a4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.061
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: