Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Bioadaptor) has uncaging elements that disengage after the resorption of the polymer coating, aiming to restore vessel function in the treated segment and to avoid long-term adverse outcomes associated with the permanent caging of the coronary artery seen with conventional stenting. Methods: 24 mm in length. Clinical follow-up was performed up to 36 months. This analysis includes the intention-to-treat population and is based on data available. The preclinical studies include optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses of 5 DynamX Bioadaptors implanted in 3 mini Yucatan pigs (at 3, 12 and 24 months), and assessment of smooth muscle cell gene expression profile in 8 pigs of which each was implanted with the DynamX Bioadaptor and the Xience drug-eluting stent. To assess the gene expression profile by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, animals were sacrificed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: at 24 months) and identified an increased expression of contractile genes around 9 months compared to a conventional drug-eluting stent. Conclusions: The DynamX Bioadaptor demonstrated very good 36-month clinical outcomes, highlighted by the absence of target-vessel myocardial infarction and definite or probable device thrombosis, and only one target lesion revascularization up to 36 months. These data are supported by preclinical studies that showed late lumen enlargement by OCT and an increased expression of contractile genes around 9 months compared to conventional drug-eluting stents, indicating faster vessel healing. Larger clinical studies are necessary to compare outcomes against contemporary drug-eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT03429894.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verheye et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: