Key result
Adjunctive pexelizumab did not reduce median infarct size compared to placebo in patients with acute STEMI receiving fibrinolysis.
Why the study?
Complement activation mediates myocardial damage during ischemia and reperfusion, but the effects of the C5 complement monoclonal antibody fragment pexelizumab on infarct size in patients receiving reperfusion therapy were unknown.
Does pexelizumab reduce infarct size in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving fibrinolysis?
RCT (n=943)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does pexelizumab reduce infarct size in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving fibrinolysis?
Pexelizumab as an adjunct to fibrinolysis in acute STEMI did not reduce infarct size or adverse clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pexelizumab has no role as adjunct to fibrinolysis in STEMI; confirms lack of benefit from C5 inhibition on infarct size.
BACKGROUND: Complement activation mediates myocardial damage that occurs during ischemia and reperfusion through multiple pathways. We performed 2 separate, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine the effects of pexelizumab (a novel C5 complement monoclonal antibody fragment) on infarct size in patients receiving reperfusion therapy: COMPlement inhibition in myocardial infarction treated with thromboLYtics (COMPLY) and COMplement inhibition in Myocardial infarction treated with Angioplasty (COMMA). The COMPLY trial is reported here. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 943 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (20% with isolated inferior MI) receiving fibrinolysis were randomly assigned <6 hours after symptom onset to placebo, pexelizumab 2.0-mg/kg bolus, or pexelizumab 2.0-mg/kg bolus plus 0.05 mg/kg per h for 20 hours. Infarct size determined by creatine kinase-MB area under the curve was the primary analysis, which included patients who received at least some study drug and fibrinolysis (n=920). The median infarct size did not differ by treatment (placebo, 5230; bolus, 4952; bolus plus infusion, 5557 [ng/mL] x h; bolus versus placebo, P=0.85; bolus plus infusion versus placebo, P=0.81), nor did the 90-day composite incidence of death, new or worsening congestive heart failure, shock, or stroke (placebo, 18.6%; bolus, 18.4%; bolus plus infusion, 19.7%). Pexelizumab inhibited complement for 4 hours with bolus-only dosing and for 20 to 24 hours with bolus-plus-infusion dosing, with no increase in infections. CONCLUSIONS: When used adjunctively with fibrinolysis, pexelizumab blocked complement activity but reduced neither infarct size by creatine kinase-MB assessment nor adverse clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahaffey et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=943). Pexelizumab vs. Placebo was evaluated on Infarct size determined by creatine kinase-MB area under the curve (p=0.85). Adjunctive pexelizumab did not reduce median infarct size compared to placebo in patients with acute STEMI receiving fibrinolysis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: