Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes discourse structure and proposes a syntax-centered instructional framework for improving writing tasks.
This study analyzes the discourse structure of TORFL B1 Writing Task 2 and proposes a syntax-centered instructional framework. The task requires test-takers to summarize a text and present an opinion in a structured form, emphasizing discourse organization beyond sentence-level accuracy. Analysis of exam materials shows a consistent macro-structure of problem presentation, multiple perspectives, and evaluative conclusion. Learner data further reveal that high-scoring essays incorporate four key components—objectification, causality, contrast, and proposal—while lower-scoring essays often lack these elements. This indicates that assessment focuses on discourse-level completeness as well as grammatical accuracy. Accordingly, this study identifies the syntactic devices associated with these components and suggests a staged instructional framework. It also reinterprets scoring criteria in relation to discourse structure, highlighting the need to align instruction with assessment. Overall, the study shows that TORFL B1 Writing Task 2 evaluates structured discourse performance rather than topic knowledge, and it emphasizes the importance of systematically developing discourse competence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heeyoun Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: