Following the publication of the original article 1, it is reported that the GAPDH in Fig. 3g had been incorrectly presented, which resulted from an inadvertent lapse in file management and figure preparation.Specifically, the exposure image of UCHL3 in Fig. 1f was mistakenly used for the GAPDH panel in Fig. 3g.The GAPDH band in Fig. 3g has been replaced with the experimental data attached to this correct version.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.