Background and Objective: Due to disasters and calamities, the number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the country is steadily increasing. With their disadvantaged situation, this population is prone to experiencing powerlessness and poor health outcomes. However, there is limited information on how these communities can gain control over their health and well-being. While community empowerment is a crucial process in the health sciences, this concept remains understudied. Hence, this study aimed to explore the process of community empowerment in health and develop a theory grounded on the experiences of displaced communities. Methods: This study utilized the classic grounded theory (CGT), primarily aimed at discovering a conceptual theory anchored on the experiences of internally displaced persons. Particularly, this GT variant sought to explicate a social process of community empowerment in health through the participants' lenses. A total of 45 individuals from six towns of Bulacan province, Philippines were purposively recruited to participate in focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Data analysis employed the constant comparison method, which involved concept development, reduction, and refinement to derive the emerging theory from the gathered information. Results: in managing their own health needs, promoting healthcare access, and addressing other social determinants of health. Moreover, study findings highlight the unique contribution of women, spirituality, and multisectoral engagement in facilitating the process of community empowerment. Conclusion: This is one of the first few studies to explore the process of community empowerment in health, which guided the development of a theory based on the experiences of internally displaced communities. The theory emphasizes that community empowerment is an iterative and continuous process that involves interactions among community members and other stakeholders. Holistic social preparation and capacity building, together with the integration of local culture and philosophy, could support the successful transition of IDPs into their new lives. Hence, multisectoral collaboration involving government agencies, private offices, higher education institutions, healthcare facilities, and faith-based organizations is crucial in promoting the movement of IDPs from marginalization towards gaining control over their health.
RN et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: