Experimental study evaluates structural performance of diaphragm walls, suggesting improved strength with specific joint configurations and retrofitting.
This study investigates the influence of longitudinal cold joints on the structural performance of self-compacting concrete diaphragm walls reinforced with polypropylene fibers. Experimental quasi-static four-point bending tests were conducted on eight small-scale specimens (60 * 900 * 2600)mm to evaluate various joint configurations: flat (reference), keyed, trapezoidal, triangular, and semi-circular geometries, alongside chemical treatments (epoxy bonding) and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) shear pocket retrofitting. The instrumentation strategy utilized five strategically positioned strain gauges and a mid-span LVDT to capture localized deformation patterns at the interface and monitor vertical deflection. This setup enabled a comprehensive analysis of stiffness, ductility, and post-cracking response, providing insights into how interfacial treatments alter failure modes compared to the control. Results demonstrate that joint geometry and chemical treatments fundamentally redefine load-transfer mechanisms. The UHPC-filled shear pockets achieved the most significant performance enhancement, yielding a 29% increase in ultimate load through high-strength dowel action and the activation of a compression strut mechanism. Geometrically, triangular profiles maximized load capacity by 40% but exhibited brittle failure, whereas semi-circular joints provided superior ductility and optimized stress distribution via a hinge-like response. Furthermore, epoxy bonding enhanced interfacial shear resistance while preserving yield characteristics. The findings highlight a critical trade-off between strength and ductility; specifically, trapezoidal and keyed joints effectively restricted transverse dilation. Ultimately, advanced configurations (UHPC and semi-circular) ensured structural continuity by shielding the central wall region and inhibiting crack propagation from lateral panels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousef et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: