Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental studies show children infer knowledge and preferences from speech disfluencies, suggesting complex cognitive reasoning.
Delays and disfluencies (“um”) are ubiquitous in conversation and signal what's going on inside a speaker's mind. Three studies demonstrate how children (age 4–9) draw mental inferences from disfluencies (N = 305; 48% girls; majority White; collected 2019–2022). When 2 speakers made accurate factual claims, children by 4 inferred that a disfluent speaker was less knowledgeable, but made no such inference when speakers claimed ignorance (Experiment 1). When 2 speakers stated a toy preference, children by 6 inferred that a disfluent speaker had a weaker preference for that toy, but a stronger preference for an alternative (Experiments 2 and 3). Overall, children use disfluencies to reason flexibly about the mental states behind someone's words, imbuing disfluencies with radically different meanings across these conversational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: