Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates axial compressive performance in light-gauge CFST columns, suggesting expansive concrete improves structural reliability.
This study conducts an extensive analysis of the axial compressive performance of rectangular light-gauge steel tube columns filled with expansive self-compacting concrete (ESCC). Thirty-six concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) samples, comprising conventional self-compacting concrete (SCC) and type K expansive cement-based SCC, as well as six hollow control samples, were subjected to monotonic axial loading tests. The experimental program included modifications in steel tube thickness (2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm), concrete grade (M30, M40, and M50), and column slenderness ratio to evaluate their impact on structural performance. The use of expansive agents successfully generated self-stress in the concrete core, hence improving the interaction among steel and concrete composites, as validated by strain measurements and analytical models. The ESCC-filled columns demonstrated enhanced confinement effects, delayed the initiation of local buckling,and significant improvements in load-bearing capability, resulting in strength increases of up to 21% compared with their SCC-filled equivalents. Finite element models created in ABAQUS precisely mirrored the experimental behaviour, with prediction discrepancies confined to a 10% margin. Additionally, a revised theoretical model adjusted to incorporate self-stress and confinement effects exhibited a robust association with the empirical results. The performance metrics, including strength enhancement, confinement efficiency, ductility, and concrete contribution, validate the efficiency of expansive self-compacting concrete in refining the structural integrity of CFST columns. The results highlight the promise of expansive self-compacting concrete as a pivotal material innovation for enhancing the reliability and load-bearing capacity of light-gauge steel–concrete composite columns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: