Key result
Oral acetazolamide fails to increase fluid loss vs standard care but prevents serum chloride reduction.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether oral acetazolamide increases diuresis and reduces chloride loss when combined with high-dose intravenous furosemide in patients hospitalized with heart failure.
Does oral acetazolamide added to high-dose intravenous furosemide increase diuresis and reduce chloride loss in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure?
RCT (n=46)
Open-label
1:1 using a random permuted block
No
Does oral acetazolamide added to high-dose intravenous furosemide increase diuresis and reduce chloride loss in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure?
In patients hospitalized with heart failure, adding oral acetazolamide to high-dose intravenous furosemide prevented serum chloride loss but did not significantly increase diuresis and was associated with frequent side effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against routine acetazolamide with high-dose IV furosemide in acute HF; challenges additive benefit seen in standard-dose trials.
BACKGROUND: We assessed whether oral acetazolamide (ACZ) increases diuresis and reduces chloride loss when given alongside high-dose intravenous (IV) furosemide in patients admitted to hospital with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: ADA-HF was a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to ACZ 250 mg twice daily plus high-dose (240 mg per day) IV furosemide infusion (standard of care (SoC)) versus SoC alone for 4 days. The co-primary endpoints were (1) daily net fluid loss between baseline and day 4 and (2) change in serum chloride level from baseline to day 4. A total of 46 patients (median age, 76; 65% male; median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 4097 ng/L) from a screened population of 207 were randomised (23 to ACZ, 23 to SoC). The median daily net fluid loss was 1073 mL (1st-3rd quartile range 682-1419 mL) in the ACZ arm vs. 1029 mL (201-1432 mL) in the SoC arm (P = 0.51). There was no change in serum chloride concentration in the ACZ arm, whereas chloride fell by 7 (2-10) mmol/L in the SoC arm (P < 0.001). The number of adverse and serious adverse events ((S)AE) was numerically greater in the ACZ arm (51 events in 16 patients vs. 29 events in 10 patients, P = 0.24). Overall, 8 patients (30%) experienced (S)AEs possibly related to ACZ, and two of whom withdrew from the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Acetazolamide has a significant "chloride-sparing" effect in patients given high-dose IV furosemide. However, ACZ did not significantly increase diuresis, and side effects from oral ACZ were frequent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13060336; 9/2/2023.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuthbert et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with venous congestion (n=46). Acetazolamide vs. Standard of care (high-dose IV furosemide alone) was evaluated on Daily net fluid loss between baseline and day 4 (mL) (p=0.51). Oral acetazolamide did not significantly increase daily net fluid loss compared to standard of care (1073 mL vs 1029 mL, p=0.51) but prevented serum chloride reduction in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: