Why the study?
It was unclear whether myocardial deformation analysis by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance and speckle tracking echocardiography could be used interchangeably across various cardiovascular diseases and healthy subjects.
Does feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) provide interchangeable myocardial strain measurements compared to speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Population
40 patients with various cardiovascular diseases and 10 healthy subjects
Comparison
FT-CMR vs STE for myocardial deformation analysis
Design
Comparative imaging study
Authors
Loading...
FT-CMR and STE myocardial strains should not yet be used interchangeably; leaves open need for modality-specific references in cardiovascular disease.
Does feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) provide interchangeable myocardial strain measurements compared to speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Myocardial strain measurements by FT-CMR and STE show modest correlation but significant systematic bias, indicating the two modalities should not be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
Pryds et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: