Why the study?
Despite growth in qualitative research, cardiology outcomes investigators have little guidance on when and how best to implement these methods, leaving their full potential unrealized.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports qualitative methods integration in CV outcomes research; extends methodological options for future studies.
Qualitative research offers unique opportunities to contribute to cardiovascular outcomes research. Despite the growth in qualitative research over the last decade, outcomes investigators in cardiology still have relatively little guidance on when and how best to implement these methods in their investigations, leaving the full potential of these methods unrealized. We offer a contemporary look at qualitative methods, including publication trends of qualitative studies in cardiology journals from 1998 to 2018, novel emerging data collection and analytic methods, and current use and examples of cardiovascular outcomes research that apply qualitative methods such as user-centered design, preimplementation evaluation, implementation evaluation, effectiveness evaluation, and policy analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McIlvennan et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: