Why the study?
Does carotid intima-media thickness correlate with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in male patients assessed for chest pain?
Does carotid intima-media thickness correlate with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in male patients assessed for chest pain?
Carotid intima-media thickness measured by ultrasound is significantly increased in patients with coronary artery disease and correlates with the number of involved vessels, suggesting its utility as a non-invasive marker for CAD.
High resolution ultrasound can be used for the accurate measurement of intima-media thickness (IMT). The within-observer coefficient of variation of the IMT of two carotids measured seven times each on different days by two different observers was between 4% and 8%, and the mean absolute difference of the IMT of 68 carotids measured independently by two observers was 0.11 +/- 0.11 mm (mean value +/- SD). Seventy-five consecutive male patients who underwent coronary angiography for assessment of chest pain and 40 normal controls matched for age and sex, were examined with high resolution B-mode ultrasound. The IMT of the common carotid artery for the controls was 0.71 +/- 0.16 mm and for the patients 0.91 +/- 0.18 mm (P < 0.005). In patients with normal coronary angiogram the IMT was 0.73 +/- 0.1 mm, and this increased in each of the subgroups with coronary stenosis compared to patients who had a normal coronary angiogram. In the group with one-vessel disease it was 0.91 +/- 0.17 mm (P < 0.05, ANOVA), in the group with two-vessel disease it was 0.96 +/- 0.17 mm (P < 0.01), and in the group with three-vessel disease it was 0.99 +/- 0.21 mm (P < 0.01). There was a significant linear trend between IMT and the number of involved vessels (P < 0.0001, r = 0.44). An IMT > or = 0.85 mm was derived from the studied population of 75 patients as a criterion for the prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geroulakos et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: