Why the study?
Do chronic stress and negative spousal relationship quality affect systolic blood pressure over time in middle-aged and older couples?
Do chronic stress and negative spousal relationship quality affect systolic blood pressure over time in middle-aged and older couples?
Chronic stress and negative relationship quality have dyadic effects on systolic blood pressure in older couples, highlighting the importance of considering both partners in cardiovascular risk assessment.
May support incorporating partner stress into older adults' BP assessment; leaves open causal effects and intervention targets.
OBJECTIVES: The cardiovascular system may represent a significant pathway by which marriage and stress influence health, but research has focused on married individuals cross-sectionally. This study examined associations among chronic stress, negative spousal relationship quality, and systolic blood pressure over time among middle-aged and older husbands and wives. METHOD: Participants were from the nationally representative longitudinal Health and Retirement Study. A total of 1,356 (N = 2,712) married and cohabitating couples completed psychosocial and biomeasure assessments in waves 2006 and 2010. Analyses examined whether Wave 1 (2006) relationship quality and stress were associated with changes in blood pressure over time. RESULTS: The effects of stress and negative relationship quality were dyadic and varied by gender. Husbands had increased blood pressure when wives reported greater stress, and this link was exacerbated by negative spousal relationship quality. Negative relationship quality predicted increased blood pressure when both members of the couple reported negative quality relations. DISCUSSION: Findings support the dyadic biopsychosocial model of marriage and health indicating: (a) stress and relationship quality directly effect the cardiovascular system, (b) relationship quality moderates the effect of stress, and (c) the dyad rather than only the individual should be considered when examining marriage and health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birditt et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: