Why the study?
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is characterized by coronary and symptomatic extra-coronary artery dissections, but factors associated with SCAD-related complications remain unclear.
Does the use of β1-selective blockers or calcium-channel blockers affect the risk of major adverse dissection-related cardiovascular events in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection?
Does the use of β1-selective blockers or calcium-channel blockers affect the risk of major adverse dissection-related cardiovascular events in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection?
In patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection, the use of β1-selective blockers is associated with a lower risk of recurrent events, whereas calcium-channel blockers are associated with a higher risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
β1-selective blockers were associated with lower MADCE in SCAD; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is characterized by coronary and symptomatic extra-coronary artery dissections. However, factors associated with SCAD-related complications remain unclear. METHODS: The ISCAD-CATCH was a multicenter observational study that enrolled 566 Japanese patients with SCAD. Clinical characteristics of those with and without major adverse dissection-related cardiovascular events (MADCE = cardiac death+recurrent SCAD+symptomatic extra-coronary artery dissection) were compared. RESULTS: During the 1490-day observational period (interquartile range = 352-2242 days), 13.4 % of the study participants experienced MADCE (cardiac death = 1.2 %; recurrent SCAD = 10.9 %; symptomatic non-coronary artery dissection = 1.6 %). Patients with SCAD experiencing MADCE were younger (47.5 ± 10.5 vs. 51.0 ± 10.7 years, p = 0.006) and had a greater frequency of multi-vessel coronary dissections (21.1 vs. 12.7 %, p = 0.048), primary PCI (56.6 vs. 43.3 %, p = 0.030), and mechanical circulatory support (15.8 vs. 6.9 %, p = 0.009). Furthermore, patients with MADCE more frequently received calcium-channel blockers (53.9 vs. 39.2 %, p = 0.015), whereas they were less likely treated with β1-selective blockers (18.4 vs. 33.7 %, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.975, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.953-0.997, p = 0.029), β1-selective blockers (HR = 0.520, 95 %CI = 0.279-0.967, p = 0.039), and calcium channel blockers (HR = 1.682, 95 %CI = 1.051-2.691, p = 0.030) were independently associated with MADCE. The frequency of MADCE increased to 30.6 % in patients with SCAD aged <50 years, non-usage of β1-selective blockers, and use of calcium-channel blockers (HR = 3.215, 95 %CI = 2.000-5.166, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 13 % of Japanese patients with SCAD experienced MADCE. MADCE risk increased with age, non-usage of β1-selective blockers, and the use of calcium-channel blockers. Medical therapies need to be adequately selected to mitigate the future risks of MADCE after SCAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu Kataoka (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: