Why the study?
Does aerosolised iloprost effectively identify acute responders to calcium channel blockers in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to infused adenosine?
Does aerosolised iloprost effectively identify acute responders to calcium channel blockers in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to infused adenosine?
Aerosolised iloprost is as effective as infused adenosine for identifying long-term responders to calcium channel blockers in IPAH, but is significantly better tolerated.
May support iloprost as a better-tolerated vasoreactivity test in IPAH; leaves open randomized confirmation for long-term CCB responder prediction.
The aim of this study was to confirm the utility of aerosolised iloprost for identifying long-term responders to calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). While undergoing right heart catheterisation, 74 patients with IPAH sequentially received incremental infusions of adenosine and aerosolised iloprost. The effects of the two vasodilators on haemodynamic parameters were recorded. All acute responders identified by aerosolised iloprost were subsequently treated with high doses of a CCB and were re-evaluated after 12 months. Both adenosine and iloprost produced significant decreases in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and significant increases in cardiac index. Adverse effects were experienced by 35 out of the 74 patients with adenosine, but by only two with iloprost. Aerosolised iloprost identified more acute responders than infused adenosine (10 versus eight, respectively) according to the criteria recommended in recent consensus guidelines. Nine responders identified by iloprost were followed-up after 12 months of high-dose CCB therapy. Five had normal or near-normal haemodynamics and a World Health Organization functional classification of I or II after 12 months. Aerosolised iloprost is an appropriate new agent to identify long-term responders to CCBs in patients with IPAH. It is as effective in this regard as infused adenosine but is better tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: