Why the study?
Does abdominal aortic calcification detected by dual X-ray absorptiometry predict cardiovascular events in subjects without prior cardiovascular disease?
Does abdominal aortic calcification detected by dual X-ray absorptiometry predict cardiovascular events in subjects without prior cardiovascular disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abdominal aortic calcification detected incidentally on routine vertebral fracture assessment is a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events in patients without known cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry can visualize abdominal aortic calcification (AAC). AAC correlates with total atherosclerosis burden. We questioned whether VFA-detected AAC could be used for cardiovascular risk assessment. METHODS: VFA images of 2,500 subjects were evaluated to detect and score AAC (n = 164). A random age- and gender-matched set of subjects (n = 325) without AAC served as control group. Patients with prior cardiovascular disease or procedures were excluded. Base-line cardiovascular risk factors and further cardiovascular events were checked. Design-based Cox regression analysis was used to examine the prognostic value of AAC for cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: AAC-positive subjects were divided into two groups: low-AAC (score 1–3), and high-AAC group (score > 3). Mean age in the groups was 68, 68, and 71 years, percentage of females was 64.4%, 61%, and 66.1%, and the proportion of cardiovascular events within groups was 1.5%, 6.7%, and 11.9% in control, low-AAC, and high-AAC groups, respectively. Age- and gender-adjusted as well as multivariable analysis showed a significant, higher risk for cardiovascular events incidence in AAC-positive, low-AAC, and high-AAC when compared to the control group. INTERPRETATION: AAC assessed with routine VFA was shown to be a strong predictor for cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golestani et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: