PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 15, 1997American Journal of Epidemiology2,005 citationsOpen Access

Association of Coronary Heart Disease Incidence with Carotid Arterial Wall Thickness and Major Risk Factors: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993

View Full Paper
LCLloyd E. ChamblessGHGerardo HeissAFA. R. Folsom

Structured PICO

Is greater carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) associated with increased risk of incident coronary heart disease in asymptomatic individuals?

P
Population
12,841 asymptomatic individuals (7,289 women and 5,552 men) aged 45-64 years who were free of clinical CHD at baseline, from four US communities.
I
Intervention
Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement using B-mode ultrasound
C
Comparator
Extreme mean IMT (≥ 1 mm) compared to not extreme (< 1 mm)
O
Outcome
Coronary heart disease (CHD) incidencehard clinical

Greater carotid artery intima-media thickness is a noninvasive predictor of future coronary heart disease incidence in asymptomatic middle-aged adults.

Abstract

Few studies have determined whether greater carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in asymptomatic individuals is associated prospectively with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, carotid IMT, an index of generalized atherosclerosis, was defined as the mean of IMT measurements at six sites of the carotid arteries using B-mode ultrasound. The authors assessed its relation to CHD incidence over 4-7 years of follow-up (1987-1993) in four US communities (Forsyth County, North Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland) from samples of 7,289 women and 5,552 men aged 45-64 years who were free of clinical CHD at baseline. There were 96 incident events for women and 194 for men. In sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models adjusted only for age, race, and center, the hazard rate ratio comparing extreme mean IMT (> or = 1 mm) to not extreme (< 1 mm) was 5.07 for women (95% confidence interval 3.08-8.36) and 1.85 for men (95% confidence interval 1.28-2.69). The relation was graded (monotonic), and models with cubic splines indicated significant nonlinearity. The strength of the association was reduced by including major CHD risk factors, but remained elevated at higher IMT. Up to 1 mm mean IMT, women had lower adjusted annual event rates than did men, but above 1 mm their event rate was closer to that of men. Thus, mean carotid IMT is a noninvasive predictor of future CHD incidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chambless et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f29d621b51e2fbf0187597https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Only Weakly Correlated With the Extent and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease1995 · 421 citations
  2. 2Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods1989 · 8,353 citations
  3. 3The Minnesota code manual of electrocardiographic findings: Standards and procedures for measurement and classification1982 · 708 citations
  4. 4Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression.1993 · 785 citations
  5. 5A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies1982 · 4,001 citations