Analysis reveals genetic contributions of IL-18 and IL-8 variations to multiple sclerosis, highlighting distinct inflammatory pathways and implications for disease understanding.
Background/Objectives: Cytokine-mediated immune dysregulation contributes to the heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis (MS). Interleukin-18 (IL-18) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) are involved in distinct inflammatory pathways; however, their genetic contributions to disease susceptibility and radiological activity remain incompletely defined. Methods: In this study, 98 relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) patients and 98 healthy controls were genotyped for IL-18 and IL-8 variations using PCR-based methods. Clinical data and MRI findings were analyzed in the MS cohort. Associations with disease susceptibility, clinical severity (EDSS), and MRI activity were evaluated using regression analyses. Results: IL-18 (−137 G/C) and IL-8 variations were significantly associated with MS susceptibility. The G allele of IL-18 (−137), the T allele of IL-8 (−251), and the C allele of IL-8 (+781) were more frequent in MS patients. No significant associations were observed between cytokine variations and clinical severity measures. However, IL-18 (−137) variation was significantly associated with higher baseline MRI lesion burden, with C allele carriers showing increased lesion counts. In addition, IL-8 (−251 AA genotype) was independently associated with increased annual lesion development. These findings were confirmed in multivariable regression analyses. Conclusions: IL-18 and IL-8 gene variations contribute to MS through distinct but complementary mechanisms. IL-18 appears to be primarily involved in disease susceptibility and baseline inflammatory burden, whereas IL-8 is more closely associated with ongoing radiological activity. These results highlight the importance of integrating genetic and imaging biomarkers to better understand disease heterogeneity in MS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kehaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: