PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Global Prevalence of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
NLNicole LonniTRTúlio Silva RosaCPCamilla Kammer Pereira

Key Points

  • To estimate the global prevalence of histopathologically confirmed oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), excluding oral lichen planus.
  • Comprehensive literature search conducted with predefined eligibility criteria.
  • 108 studies included, comprising 86 new and 22 from previous reviews.
  • Data analysis performed to derive pooled prevalence rates.
  • Pooled prevalence of OPMDs estimated at 4.67% with a 95% CI of 3.62-5.84.
  • Regional prevalence: Asia (5.44%), South America/Caribbean (5.21%), Europe (4.89%).
  • Epithelial dysplasia found in 46.21% of cases, predominantly among males (62.87%) and those aged ≥ 50 years.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) represent a diverse group of mucosal disorders with varying risks of progression to oral cancer. OBJECTIVE: This updated systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) estimated the global prevalence of histopathologically confirmed OPMDs, excluding oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using predefined eligibility criteria. A total of 108 studies were included, comprising 86 additional studies and 22 from a previous SR. RESULTS: The overall pooled prevalence of OPMDs was 4.67% (95% CI: 3.62-5.84). Prevalence of OPMDs was as follows: Asia (5.44%), followed by South America/Caribbean (5.21%), and Europe (4.89%). Considering OPMD cases, the proportion was higher among males (62.87%) and individuals aged ≥ 50 years (68.1%). Histopathological evidence of epithelial dysplasia was present in 46.21% of cases. Oral leukoplakia (OL), oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), and actinic cheilitis (AC) emerged as the most prevalent lesions, with relevant differences considering the geographic regions. OL and OSMF were the most common OPMDs in Asia, while OL and AC predominated in South America/Caribbean, and in Europe OL remains the most frequently encountered OPMD. CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of OPMDs, estimated at approximately 5%, should be interpreted as a broad summary measure, given the substantial heterogeneity driven by regional variations possibly related to behavioral, biological, and/or environmental risk factors. Future preventive efforts should focus on the type of OPMD prevalent in the region/country. The heterogeneity across studies highlights the need for standardized, population-based studies using WHO nomenclature to better define the global burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lonni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a47b8c0f03fd677638e0https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.70146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper