Retrospective analysis compares clinical characteristics and outcomes in cardiogenic shock with and without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, revealing distinct profiles yet similar mortality rates.
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) often complicates out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), contributing to high mortality despite therapeutic advances. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed patients admitted to a tertiary centre between 2021-2024. The cohort of patients with CS was divided into two groups: OHCA with return of spontaneous circulation and non-OHCA. RESULTS: The study included 280 patients with a median age of 69 (60-76) years, of whom 197 (70%) males. There were 46 (16%) patients in the OHCA group and 234 (84%) in non-OHCA. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was a more frequent cause of CS in the OHCA group: 36 (78%) vs. 113 (48%), p < 0.01. The OHCA patients were less likely to have hypertension (41% vs. 63%, p < 0.01), chronic heart failure (CHF) (41% vs. 62%, p < 0.01), and a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (11% vs. 29%, p < 0.01). The OHCA patients exhibited lower C-reactive protein) levels and higher levels of white blood cells. Despite distinct profiles, there was no significant difference in mortality between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OHCA and non-OHCA CS exhibited distinct clinical profiles, with ACS as the leading cause of OHCA and chronic conditions were more often diagnosed in non-OHCA cases. Similar mortality rates suggest improved OHCA management, emphasizing the need for extensive data collection to assess shock risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krupka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: