CapSeg demonstrates automated assessment of fibrous caps in coronary arteries, implying improved plaque rupture risk evaluation.
Aims Accurate characterization of fibrous caps in coronary arteries allows more precise estimations of coronary plaque rupture risk. While intravascular imaging techniques offer high-resolution imaging, limitations in contrast and reliance on manual interpretation hinder large-scale, volumetric assessments of cap morphology. In this study, we present CapSeg, a fully automated computational pipeline for in-vivo fibrous cap segmentation and thickness measurement, leveraging intravascular polarization-sensitive OCT (IV-PS-OCT). By incorporating reflectance, birefringence, and depolarization metrics, CapSeg differentiates fibrous caps from lipid-rich cores, enabling automated extraction of minimum cap thickness and polarization properties across entire vessel segments. Methods and Results Using a dataset of 200 cross-sectional coronary IV-PS-OCT images, CapSeg’s minimum cap thickness measurements were validated against manual annotations from two expert observers. Automated cap thickness measurements showed strong agreement with manual assessments (mean ± SD: CapSeg 131 ± 80 µm; Observer 1: 137 ± 84 µm; Observer 2: 144 ± 83 µm) demonstrating comparable limits of agreement relative to the inter-observer variability. The pipeline was applied to volumetric IV-PS-OCT data of 38 coronary lesions from patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n = 23) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS, n = 15). This analysis revealed decreased birefringence (3.7·10−4 vs 4.5·10−4) and increased depolarization (9.6·10−2 vs 8.6·10−2) in the fibrous caps of patients with acute disease. Conclusions Overall, CapSeg enables fast, reproducible, and fully automated fibrous cap evaluation, laying the foundation for large-scale clinical studies and real-time intravascular imaging applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: