A low-cost calibration method enhances robot automation in SMEs, showing improved accuracy and performance.
Purpose This study aims to address the high cost, inter-axis error amplification and circular verification defects of traditional Stewart parallel robot calibration, to meet SMEs’ low-cost and high-precision calibration demands with dual-camera three-dimensional imaging. Design/methodology/approach Fixed transformations are acquired via rigid molds, vernier caliper measurements and medium-angle visual verification. An inter-axis adaptive weighted least squares strategy is designed, and a dual verification framework combining repeat positioning accuracy and assembly success rate is built. The method is validated via theoretical derivation, simulation and physical experiments. Findings Post-calibration position/attitude error RMSE reaches 0.5435 mm/0.0163 rad, outperforming mainstream low-cost algorithms by 38.0–41.0% and 29.4–36.6%. The assembly success rate hits 93% with hardware cost merely 5% of traditional schemes. Research limitations/implications The method has a slight systematic error (=0.02 mm) in fixed transformation measurement and is suitable for scenarios without strict absolute accuracy requirements. Practical implications It enables low-cost automated calibration, providing a feasible solution for SMEs to implement robot automation and promoting intelligent manufacturing popularization. Originality/value This work proposes three innovations: a high-end equipment-independent fixed transformation acquisition method, a variance-based weighted optimization strategy and a noncircular dual verification framework, achieving a systematic integration of theory, simulation and experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: