Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows deep learning models outperform Random Forest in detection performance of system calls.
Host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDSs) can address the limitations of network-based detection by analyzing system calls and other low-level events. Many existing benchmark datasets remain inadequate for evaluating modern attacks because they were built in outdated environments and cover only a limited set of attack behaviors. To address this gap, this study builds a TextRank-based preprocessing pipeline on the LID-DS 2021 dataset and compares five end-to-end pipelines: Random Forest (RF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) + LSTM, LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and CNN + Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU). Of the 15 scenarios in the dataset, six multi-stage attacks were excluded, and three representative scenarios were selected based on attack-category coverage and suitability for single-chunk host-level detection. Within these three selected scenarios and same-scenario file-level splits, the deep learning pipelines achieved F1-scores of 0.90–0.94, whereas RF ranged from 0.55 to 0.63. Among the evaluated pipelines, CNN + BiGRU produced the strongest overall results. These findings indicate that, under this constrained evaluation setting, sequential deep learning pipelines can be effective for scenario-specific system-call-based HIDS; however, broader generalization to unseen attacks or to the full LID-DS 2021 scenario set remains unverified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
You et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: