Why the study?
Aortic regurgitation is underdiagnosed, conservatively treated in patients unsuitable for surgery, and awareness of novel dedicated transcatheter heart valves needs to be spread.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel dedicated transcatheter heart valves offer a promising treatment option for patients with aortic regurgitation at increased surgical risk, though pacemaker implantation rates remain a concern.
Aortic regurgitation (AR) has long been an underdiagnosed and underestimated valvular heart disease. Nevertheless, large cohort studies demonstrated that the prevalence of clinically relevant AR ranges from 1.6% to 4.5% in individuals aged ≥65 years. Despite a markedly increased mortality risk, AR was often treated conservatively, especially in patients considered unsuitable for surgery. Early attempts to treat AR patients with conventional transcatheter devices led to unsatisfactory results, mainly due to elevated rates of valve migration or embolization, and relevant paravalvular regurgitation. Recently, dedicated transcatheter heart valves, such as the JenaValve Trilogy System and the J-Valve, have been introduced and indicated high procedural success rates and improved clinical outcomes. However, both interventional and surgical treatment of AR are associated with increased need for pacemaker implantation, follow-up data is scarce, and referring physicians are often unaware of novel dedicated devices. Awareness needs to be spread to provide optimal treatment for AR patients with increased surgical risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nienaber et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: