Randomized trial evaluates safety and feasibility of MicroHand S system in urological surgeries, suggesting a viable option for complex procedures.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the enhanced MicroHand S surgical robot system in urological minimally invasive cancer surgeries, in alignment with the IDEAL-D Framework Stage 2a. Methods: Procedures were performed by an experienced urologist from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University using the MicroHand S surgical robot system. Patients requiring radical cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, or radical prostatectomy were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of unplanned conversion from robot-assisted surgery to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery. An independent Clinical Expert Committee reviewed the study to adjudicate the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). All patients were followed for 1 year postoperatively. Results: These procedures included 12 radical cystectomies, 8 radical prostatectomies, and 3 partial nephrectomies. All procedures were completed successfully without the need for conversion to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery. No robotic devices or surgical instruments related AEs were recorded during the procedure. All patients had a postoperative Clavien–Dindo classification of grade Ⅰ before discharge (100%). No patients returned to the operating room within 24 hours of surgery. At 1- year follow-up none patient presented a tumor recurrence. Conclusions: The MicroHand S system is safe and feasible for complex urological MICS, supporting further clinical trial recruitment. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NCT 05462392), registration number: NCT05462392.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: