Investigates new method for multimodal named entity recognition, indicating improved interaction and performance.
Multimodal named entity recognition(MNER) has achieved significant progress in recent years. However, existing approaches still suffer from two drawbacks. Firstly, for interaction effectiveness, the shallow multimodal interaction models fail in capturing fine-grained interactions between multimodal instances and suffer from limited modality information. The deep models that use simple concatenation strategies demand a huge amount of computation resources while achieving better performance. Secondly, for interaction strategies, if the associated image is noisy and unrelated to the text, multimodal representation in MNER is often biased and even omits the important information from the dominant modality in current fusion methods, which makes them suffer from visual bias. To address the above issues, we proposed DESER ( DE ep Modular S kip Attention Networks for MN ER ) to effectively model the interactions across modalities and debias the noisy modality impact. Unlike shallow crossmodal attention models that capture only single-layer interactions, and deep concatenation-based frameworks that indiscriminately fuse modalities at all layers, DESER introduces a modular skip-attention architecture that enables deep, text-guided multimodal interaction while explicitly preserving dominant textual semantics. The proposed Skip-Attention layer creates interlayer shortcuts that selectively bypass visual adaptation, allowing the model to balance interaction depth and computational efficiency. Furthermore, different from existing fusion methods that assume visual information is always beneficial, DESER incorporates a multimodal gating fusion module with self-optimizing pseudo-label training, which explicitly models modality dominance and suppresses noisy or irrelevant visual signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: