PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Cement and Concrete Composites2 citationsOpen Access

Directional pore structure governs compressive anisotropy in 3D printed concrete

View Full Paper
HCHanbin ChengFAFaisal N. AljuwayhelSCS.H. Chu

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how the directional pore structure in 3D printed concrete affects compressive strength.
  • Developed a loading-direction-resolved pore directional index to assess defect severity.
  • Compared compressive strengths of specimens printed along four different paths and a cast control using identical mixture.
  • Employed image-informed finite-element models to validate strength ratios under directional compression.
  • Directional compressive strengths along x, y, and z were quantitatively linked to pore structure in specific orientations.
  • Maximum relative errors in strength ratios between simulations and experiments were 13.69% (x–z) and 9.42% (y–z).
  • Findings confirm that pore structure significantly influences printing path-dependent anisotropy.

Abstract

3D printed concrete produced from an identical mixture exhibits distinct compressive strengths under different printing paths. This anisotropy originates from printing-induced pore alignment that alters load transfer. Scalar porosity and qualitative interlayer descriptors lack loading-direction resolution and cannot capture direction-specific strength penalties or in-plane strength re-ranking. To address this gap, a loading-direction-resolved pore directional index is developed to link pore elongation, area weighting, and orientation to direction-specific defect severity. Specimens produced with four representative printing paths and a cast control are investigated using a fixed mixture. Directional compressive strengths along x , y , and z are quantitatively linked to pore structure on x – z and y – z sections. This mechanism is validated using image-informed finite-element models of reconstructed pore-scale representative volume elements subjected to directional compression. The simulated strength ratios agree with experiments, with maximum relative errors of 13.69% ( x–z ) and 9.42% ( y–z ), demonstrating that pore structure controls printing path-dependent anisotropy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f1471e5f7920c638704ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2026.106640
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper